Try the political quiz
 @VOTANewsElectionsJoe BidenPresidentStudent LoansWhite HouseGovernmentAdministrationNationalRepublican•••2yrs ago

Republican Lawmakers Who Oppose Student Loan Relief Took Paycheck Protection Plan Loans

On Thursday the White House released a graphic on social media listing Republican Congressman who oppose student loan relief and how much they received in Paycheck Protection Plan Loans.

Georgia District 9 Representative Andrew Clyde, (R) tweeted his disapproval of the Biden-Harris Administration’s student debt relief, SDR, and SAVE plan.

Following President Biden’s announcement of his administration’s plan to cancel millions of dollars in student debt, Rep.

Clyde tweeted:

“Joe Biden once again announces that he will transfer millions more in student debt onto the backs of hardworking taxpayers. This scam is nothing more than a desperate attempt to buy votes with Americans’ hard-earned money.”

Three hours following that tweet, The White House swiftly responded claiming:

“Congressman Clyde had $156,697 of debt forgiven from a PPP loan.”

A PPP loan or a Paycheck Protection Program is a loan forgiveness program usually for small businesses to help them pay for rent, mortgage interest and utilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Financial and business experts dub PPP loans as one of the largest U.S. government business bailouts ever, noting their impact on local and national elections through funds to businesses and banks in certain locations.

As the feud continues, Rep.

Clyde Responded:

“Old Joe has confused non-taxable income with one of his “loans.” But I certainly hope the IRS received its “fair share” of 10% for the Big Guy!”

Amid the heated exchange, the debate over student debt relief and government assistance programs underscores the broader challenges and divisions facing American politics today.

.

No replies yet…

Be the first to reply to this general discussion.

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Trump's Deportation Storm: America Braces for Mass Exodus of Immigrants

For months, immigration advocates have been planning for the possibility of Donald Trump’s return to the White House. Now, their worst fears have arrived.Immigrants’ rights groups have spent the last year preparing for a second Trump term and an overhaul of the nation’s immigration system, analyzing Trump’s proposals, drafting legal briefs, coordinating messaging and organizing aid for immigrants and asylum seekers. They responded to Trump’s victory with alarm and vowed to put up a fight, setting the stage for four more years of contentious court battles with his administration.Some are already preparing to push current leadership at the Department of Homeland Security to take steps to stymie the incoming Trump team, particularly on immigrant detention and the use of AI in enforcement.“We should expect to see the devastation of immigrant communities all over the country. We should expect to see family separation,” said Kica Matos, the president of the National Immigration Law Center. “It is entirely possible that he will try to use the military to carry out deportations, so that means that Americans all over the country will see the military engaging in enforcement against civilian populations, which is horrifying.”Trump, after winning a historic victory on a platform of turbo-charged immigration enforcement, has said he will conduct mass deportations at a scale never before seen. Immigrant advocates have warned this would be expensive and inhumane, separating families and wrecking communities. The president-elect has also vowed to build huge detention camps, hire thousands more border agents, funnel military spending toward border security and invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expel suspected members of drug cartels and criminal gangs without court hearings.He has also said he would end “catch-and-release” — allowing migrants to remain free, often with monitoring, while they await immigration court hearings — and restore a policy from his first term requiring asylum seekers to remain in Mexico while their cases are processed. And he has dodged questions about whether he would try to bring back family separation.

▲  4333 replies